admin

0
By admin Judgements

A. Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 – Scope of Section 303 – The revisional powers can be exercised only if, the Government records its satisfaction that an order examined by it, suffers from illegality or is the product of an irregular procedure followed by the authority or the council. The scope of revision is therefore much narrower than that of an Appeal, and unless the illegality in the order is manifested or the proceedings that were conducted in such an irregular manner that would vitiate the order itself, the powers of revision cannot be exercised to set aside the order under examination.

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA ( BEFORE VALMIKI MENEZES J.) Writ Petition No. 41/2026 KAPIL MADHUKAR BETGIRI                                              ……

Read More
0
By admin Judgements

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC – compromise of suit – where the Consent Terms have been filed before the Court and the parties are requesting to draw a Consent Decree in terms of the consent before the Court – The provision mandates the Court to order such an agreement, compromise or satisfaction, which is to be recorded and a Decree to be passed in terms of the agreement of compromise.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2026 ASVAS HOMES LLP                                                                       … PETITIONER VERSUS…

Read More
0
By admin Judgements

A) RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 – Section 4, 7 – Mandatory – Public Information Officer requesting the Petitioner to attend the office of the PIO and inspect the record available at the office and obtain a certified copy of the documents on the payment of the fees is not a decision under Sub Section 1 of Section 7 of the Act, 2005. there was no compliance with the mandate of Section 7 on the part of the PIO. PIO has in fact, informed the Petitioner of the decision to give the information after the mandate of thirty days, which would entitle the Petitioner to receive this information under Sub Section 6, Section 7, free of charge.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA (VAMIKI MENEZES J.) WRIT PETITION NO. 113 OF 2026 SHRI. NARAYAN SURESH…

Read More
0
By admin Uncategorized

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC – compromise of suit – where the Consent Terms have been filed before the Court and the parties are requesting to draw a Consent Decree in terms of the consent before the Court – The provision mandates the Court to order such an agreement, compromise or satisfaction, which is to be recorded and a Decree to be passed in terms of the agreement of compromise.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2026 ASVAS HOMES LLP … PETITIONER VERSUS…

Read More
1 2 3 … 24