Updates
Updates
Domestic & International Commercial Arbitration
IMG_20241205_174707
Domestic & International Commercial Arbitration

Three Days Certified Training Course on Domestic & International Commercial Arbitration By Indian Council Of Arbitration Supported By Goa High…

74th Anniversary of the National Law Day
74th Anniversary of the National Law Day

invitation for prgm on 25.11.2023-

1 … 3 4 5 6
Judgements
Judgements
Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 – No duty on part of the Arbitrator under section 12(1) of act 1996 to make any disclosure when neither the Arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance not the Act of 1996 were in force as on the date on which the Arbitral Tribunal was constituted or the objection was raised regarding appointment of Arbitrator

  HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA ( BEFORE SUMAN SHYAM, J.) APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO. 6 OF 2022…

Indian Partnership Act, 1932 – Section 63, Rule 5 – There is no power vested in the Registrar under Section 63(1) of the Partnership Act to reject any Application for recording any changes, which are incorporated in the Deed of constituted partnership.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 171 OF 2026 (VALMIKI MENEZES & AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR,…

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order VIII Rule 6C – A counter claim is to a cause of action and not to a specific property.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 586 OF 2013 (Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) Mariano Fernandes…

Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, Principal of Natural Justice – violated – An order allowing application for intervention by former attorney in an application filed by Communidade of Cortalim under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC is passed without hearing the parties, is a nullity – If the intervenor had no right to be impleaded, independently as a defendant in the suit, he ought not to be impleaded as an intervenor in the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA (BEFORE VALMIKI MENEZES J.) WRIT PETITION No.7 OF 2026 MARIA EULALIA LEOPOLDINA CARVALHO AND…

A. Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 – Scope of Section 303 – The revisional powers can be exercised only if, the Government records its satisfaction that an order examined by it, suffers from illegality or is the product of an irregular procedure followed by the authority or the council. The scope of revision is therefore much narrower than that of an Appeal, and unless the illegality in the order is manifested or the proceedings that were conducted in such an irregular manner that would vitiate the order itself, the powers of revision cannot be exercised to set aside the order under examination.

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA ( BEFORE VALMIKI MENEZES J.) Writ Petition No. 41/2026 KAPIL MADHUKAR BETGIRI                                              ……

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC – compromise of suit – where the Consent Terms have been filed before the Court and the parties are requesting to draw a Consent Decree in terms of the consent before the Court – The provision mandates the Court to order such an agreement, compromise or satisfaction, which is to be recorded and a Decree to be passed in terms of the agreement of compromise.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2026 ASVAS HOMES LLP                                                                       … PETITIONER VERSUS…

Articles
Articles
1 … 3 4
Messages
Message from Justice Smt. Revati Mohite Dere
Message from Justice Mahesh S. Sonak
Managing Committee of the Goa High Court Bar Association
Editorial - 26th November 2021